On Tuesday, the City released the locations of 45 sites to be considered:
- Walter E. Long 11455 Decker Lake Road
- John Trevino 9501 FM 969
- Walnut Creek Sports Park 7800 Johnny Morris Road
- Given Recreation Center 3811 E. 12th Street
- Fleet Service Yard, 8401 Johnny Morris Road
- Colony Park land
- 3511 Manor Road
- Tannehill Lane
- Onion Creek Metro North
- 7720 ½ Kellam Road
- 5400 E. William Cannon, Decommissioned WWTP
- FM 812 at FM 973
- Eco-Park at FM 973
- W. Slaughter and 8908-8916-9006 Cullen Road Locations – Initial city-owned land options under review
- Parque Zaragoza Recreation Center 2609 Gonzales St.
- South Austin Recreation Center 1100 Cumberland Road
- Roy G Guerrero 400 Grove Blvd.
- 6700 Bolm Road District Park
- Edward Rendon Dellgado Pavilion
- 4800 - 4906 Bolm Road
- Levander Loop
- 1311 Tillery Street
- Gus Garcia 1201 E Rundberg Lane
- 7211 N. I-35
- 7309 N. I-35
- Mary Moore Searight 907 W. Slaughter Lane
- Lakeline Neighborhood Park
- 12101 Anderson Mill Road
- 10900 FM 2222 (WWT)
- Commons Ford Park 614 N. Commons Ford Road
- Walnut Creek/Havens
- Northwest Recreation Center
- Sir Swante Palm Neighborhood Park East 3rd St.
- Duncan Park 900 W. 9th St.
- San Beach on Cesar Chavez St.
- Patterson Park 4200 Brookview Road Locations – Initial city-owned land options under review
- Bull Creek Park Lakewood Drive
- Ryan Drive Warehouse
- Circle C
- Dick Nichols 8011 Beckett Road
- 11800 FM 1826
- 9513 Circle Drive
- 4905 Convict Hill Road
- Norwood Tract
- Austin Recreation Center
A city spokesperson told KVUE the sites listed are not final and that the list will "most certainly change." As the city examines potential sites, some locations could be removed and new locations could be added.
In this May 14 report, City leaders were required to report on several items, such as best practices for sanctioned encampments, a description of basic infrastructure for them and criteria for their selection, among other things. That report can be viewed in full here.
The report provides recommendations for basic infrastructure, including electricity and water service, restrooms, hygiene stations, and showers (mobile, if necessary), adequate lighting, and perimeter fencing where appropriate. The report states these encampments would also need general operation staff, 24/7 security personnel and service providers, as well as additional staffing for contract management, behavioral health crisis intervention and communications.
"I completely disagree with the use of park lands, both existing and undeveloped parkland," City Councilmember Mackenzie Kelly said. "Currently, we have people in our district and across the city who are not able to enjoy the green spaces that the city has to offer because of the individuals experiencing homelessness that are already there. There's been a lot of outcry from the community about how these areas are not appropriate and I agree with them."
The report also details costs associated with these potential encampments.
"One-time costs to establish encampment sites may include, but are not limited to, extending access to electricity and water lines, site grading, installation of perimeter fencing, creating or improving vehicular access and mitigation of wildfire and/or flood risk," the report states. "More detailed analysis will be necessary for each location, but an initial survey suggests that while some urban infill properties or parks may need only modest preparation (potentially under $200,000), others lack access to basic utility infrastructure or access, and would require the investment of several million dollars."
Estimated annual costs for operating a sanctioned encampment are shown in the table below:
"We're talking about estimated an estimated cost of $1.3+ million going into this and not into something that could be a more permanent and structural solution to the problem," Joao Paolo Connolly, the director of Organizing for Austin Justice Coalition, said. "It's unfortunate that we're investing so much time and resources and money in what is yet again another Band-Aid type temporary solution that does not fix or address the problem."
City staff has finished reviewing the 70+ locations, which are managed by an array of City departments such as Parks and Recreation, Austin Housing Finance Corporation, Public Works, Austin Resource Recovery and Austin Water Utility.
"The review included City assets in all council districts, with the aim of designating at least one candidate encampment site in each district consistent with Council’s resolution," the report states. "Staff has also initiated the process of screening multiple locations for safe overnight parking. Additional research related to safe overnight parking locations continues."
"The time for more meetings, more consultants, more summits, it's over," Cleo Petricek, one of the founders of Save Austin Now, said. "That should have happened two years ago. We should treat this like the crisis that it is."
As far as what's next, City staff will present an overview of the strategy, including the potential land options for encampments and safe overnight parking, at the May 18 council work session.
City leaders must also provide the following details by the specified dates:
- A proposed implementation schedule
- Estimated total costs
- Potential financial resources
- Possible community partners for cost-sharing and/or service provision
- Identify land within the city limits owned by the City of Austin, other governmental entities, or willing community partners that could accommodate ‘tiny home’ structures to serve as temporary housing
- Identify estimated costs associated with individual structures and supportive infrastructure
"In addition to meeting the need for crisis resources, the City of Austin is committed to pursuing long-term solutions to homelessness and will remain focused on existing initiatives and ambitious efforts to expand permanent housing options in our community," the report states.
Since voters made their voices heard in the May election, City Manager Spencer Cronk has been leading the plan in addressing the ban. The proposition bans people from camping in public areas that aren't designated by the Parks and Recreation Department; sitting or lying on public sidewalks in and near downtown and the University of Texas campus; and panhandling at specific hours and locations.
Days after the camping ban took effect, the city manager presented to the city council a list of potential locations where homeless people may be able to legally camp within the city limits. The Austin City Council had previously directed Cronk to share a list of city-owned sites by May 14.
The rollout of the camping ban, which took effect Tuesday, May 11, will be implemented in four phases. Starting with education and community outreach among the homeless community, it will take several weeks before actual enforcement of the ban takes effect. KVUE broke down the four phases here.
PEOPLE ARE ALSO READING: